Organised crime charges dropped against journos arrested over video against CM Revanth

Two Hyderabad-based journalists, Revathi Pogadadanda and Thanvi Yadav, were arrested for posting allegedly defamatory content against Telangana CM Revanth Reddy.
Telangana CM Revanth Reddy wearing a white shirt and a decorative purple and gold shawl is speaking into a microphone while gesturing with his right hand. He has a confident expression, a neatly trimmed beard, and a red tilak on his forehead. The background is blurred with a mix of green and purple hues, suggesting a stage or event setting.
Telangana CM Revanth ReddyFacebook/File Photo
Written by:
Published on

A Hyderabad court has struck down the Telangana police’s attempt to prosecute two journalists under Section 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, a charge reserved for serious organised crimes, Hindustan Times reported.

Revathi Pogadadanda, managing director of YouTube news channel Pulse Digital News Network, and Thanvi Yadav, an employee, were arrested earlier this month  for allegedly circulating defamatory content against Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy.

Revathi had posted a video on her channel showing an elderly farmer making allegedly derogatory remarks against Revanth Reddy. A case was lodged based on a complaint from a Congress worker. 

On March 15, CM Revanth had lashed out at social media criticism in the assembly and hinted at a new law to regulate journalism.

Telangana CM Revanth Reddy wearing a white shirt and a decorative purple and gold shawl is speaking into a microphone while gesturing with his right hand. He has a confident expression, a neatly trimmed beard, and a red tilak on his forehead. The background is blurred with a mix of green and purple hues, suggesting a stage or event setting.
‘Will strip and parade those using abusive language’: Telangana CM Revanth Reddy

Meanwhile, defending the journalists in court, their lawyer Jakkula Laxman argued that section 111 was grossly disproportionate. “All the other sections invoked carry a maximum punishment of less than seven years. Hence, immediate arrest was not warranted,” Laxman said, alleging that the women were arrested in haste due to political pressure, according to Hindustan Times.

The additional public prosecutor defended the police, arguing that the accused should have shown restraint. “The conduct of the accused was highly provocative and might have led to a disturbance of law and order in the state,” the report quoted the APP as saying.

As per the order on March 12, additional chief judicial magistrate G Anusha, while remanding the two journalists to judicial custody, ruled that invoking section 111 against them was unjustified.

“The essential ingredients of Section 111 of BNS do not attract at this stage as there is no involvement of monetary transactions or other factors mentioned under Section 111,” the court reportedly observed.

However, the court maintained other charges under the Information Technology Act and BNS provisions related to creating and circulating false information, stating that the FIR prima facie contained well-founded accusations.

This report was republished from Newslaundry as part of The News Minute-Newslaundry alliance. Read more about our partnership here.

Subscriber Picks

No stories found.
The News Minute
www.thenewsminute.com