In this week’s South Central, hosts Dhanya Rajendran and Pooja Prasanna first discuss the Transgender Persons Amendment Bill 2026, which has triggered protests across the country. They are joined by advocate Arvind Narrain of the Alternative Law Forum, who was part of the panel of lawyers who fought for IPC 377 to be struck down. Joining in is also Rumi Harish, a musician and a queer, trans, masculine and social justice activist.
Tune in to the discussions here
Listen & follow on Apple
Listen & follow on Spotify
Listen & follow on YouTube
“We must begin from the 2014 NALSA judgement, which allowed the trans community to express their gender and self-identify. Following it, a private member’s Bill was introduced to protect transgender persons, but that did not get passed. Later, an Act was passed, but it was also protested against since it did not fully encompass the self-identification aspect, which is deeply connected to the right to expression and dignity. However, it included in its ambit several persons, including traditional communities like Hijras, Kinnars, Jogtas, and Aravanis. What the current Amendment does is it narrows that definition. It says that transgender does not include trans men and trans women, and only includes traditional identities. When you recognise rights, you cannot take them away. That is the fundamental problem here,” explains Arvind.
Dhanya asks Rumi about how self-identification has worked in the last few years.
“We have a Constitution which supports self-identification, and it was officially recognised by the NALSA judgement. Transgender rights have also evolved, so when the 2014 judgement came, and the Act came later, we have gone quite far with research and work about the lives of trans persons. This new Bill is abysmally going back,” Rumi says.
Pooja points out how the gaze here is also medical, biological, and legal. Arvind says that the range of protections is now only applicable to the four traditional identities, intersex individuals, and those who are forced into being transgender. “Self-identification is also restricted to the four traditional communities. Transmen or women cannot self-identify since they are outside the framework. The projection is that this is for the communities, but that is not true. The language is also problematic. Terms like eunuchs, mutilation, etc., are used. The process also says that among these protected categories, you need to go to a medical board and then before the district Magistrate to get a certificate. But a great discretion is given to these authorities to accept or reject it,” he adds.
Pooja asks if this would create an artificial hierarchy within the community.
“Here, the government has collapsed the difference between transgender and intersex. Ubhayalingi, is an intersex term, which has been used for every transgender,” says Rumi.
Dhanya says that the element of coercion is also reminiscent of the anti-conversion law, where anyone can oppose. “This opens up the possibility of anyone, including the natal families, coming up and opposing a person’s identification as transgender,” she says.
“The problem here is with the choice- they have a problem with the choice of a person to say it is their body and their right to define it,” Arvind says.
The panel then delves into questions of how the Bill uses ambiguous language and opens up several opportunities for transgender individuals to be isolated.
In the second part of the episode, the hosts discuss the controversy over the vulgar lyrics of the new song from the movie KD: The Devil, and the problematic gaze of item songs. They are joined by TNM senior reporter Shivani Kava and Associate Editor Sukanya Shaji.
Dhanya explains how the Hindi version of the song titled Sarke chunariya was removed from YouTube because of the vulgar lyrics.
“The movie is in Kannada, but it is being released pan-India, in several languages including Hindi. This particular song was released with a lot of pomp, and once all versions were out, the Hindi version was critiqued for being crass and sexually explicit. The Kannada version also had similar lyrics. This prompted a lawyer to approach the court, and several celebrities also called the song’s Hindi version out,” Shivani says.
She also explains how the tricky part is about the lyrics. “The Hindi version, the person credited with lyrics said that the director Prem wrote the song, which he only translated verbatim,” she says.
“As a Kannadiga, I want to say these kinds of songs are very common in director Prem’s films. He will bring in a light-skinned heroine only to be in these songs. This time, the issue has gotten escalated because it has apparently been stripped of its poetic essence in translation,” she adds.
Rumi pitches in and says she does not find this poetic. Pooja speaks about Ravi Chandran and Jaggesh's songs that were equally problematic, but also how catchy the songs are. Shivani says that Bollywood has been doing this for ages, but the outrage against a Kannada film song is also due to it being a smaller and easier fish to go after.
Sukanya says that the problem is with the gaze and the whole idea of an “item”. “This gaze problem has always been there. Even in Malayalam films, the black and white ones, there would be a cabaret dance number, only to embellish the villain. The outrage cannot just be about one song or one piece of lyrics; it has to be about how someone can be called an item. It also has to be about how much control the performer has, for whose gaze it is picturised, who is picturising it, and what purpose it serves,” she adds.
Pooja says that this is not about eroticism, but the vulgarity and sexism quotient. Shivani points out how in several item songs, women are seen to sing of how it is her desire, but the lyrics are all written by men, for a certain economic model that profits from such hypersexualisation.
“How do people understand the female gaze? They think it is the opposite of making gaze where women objectify men. But the core idea is about female autonomy and desire,” says Pooja.
The panel delves into several aspects of this problem, referencing popular ‘item songs’ and how women in those songs are represented.
Tune in to this discussion here
Once a month, we will invite one TNM subscriber to the show. Write to us on what you would like to speak about to southcentral@thenewsminute.com
Send your thoughts, suggestions, and criticism as well.
You can also let us know what you think by filling out our quick feedback form. Your suggestions help shape future episodes of South Central.
Audio Timecodes
00:00:00 - Introductions
00:02:21 - Headlines
00:11:20 - Trans Bill 2026
00:43:16 - KD Song Lyrics
01:13:56 - Recommendations
References
‘This Bill is nothing but erasure’: How India’s new Trans amendment could undo decades of rights
Why KD The Devil song row is really about cinema’s old misogyny
Recommendations
Rumi Harish
Your Stick Will Not Break My Strength
Arvind Narrain
Shivani Kava
Sukanya Shaji
Laura Mulvey: Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema
Pooja Prasanna
Muddupalani, the woman who had no reason for shame
Radical Radhas: of Bangalore Nagaratnamma and Muddupalani
Dhanya Rajendran
RSS: Mapping the saffron network shaping India's politics
Contribute to our reporting fund. Click here.
To check out our other shows, Click here
To not miss any updates, join TNM's WhatsApp Channel! Click here
Produced by Bhuvan Malik, edited by Jaseem Ali, written by Sukanya Shaji.