Delimitation: Will South Lose Political Power? | Karnataka’s ‘Naxal-Free’ Claim | South Central Ep 16
In this episode of South Central, hosts Dhanya Rajendran, Pooja Prasanna, and Leena Reghunath are joined by activist and journalist Shivasundar and retired IAS officer PV Ramesh to discuss the looming delimitation and Karnataka’s Naxal journey.
With delimitation set for 2026, will south India’s political representation shrink if more seats go to northern states? What does this mean for governance, federalism, and the country’s power balance?
On delimitation, PV Ramesh says, “It does not really matter how many citizens one MP represents—certainly, the lesser, the better—but any revision must be pro-rata across the country. If seats must increase, it should be across the board by 10–20% without reference to population, ensuring fair representation for union territories and smaller states. In a country as diverse as India, a one-size-fits-all rule simply won’t work.”
Shivasundar argues, “There should be a numerical increase, but it should come with devolution of power. Why should the Lok Sabha have so much power? Devolve the power to the regional states. Bengaluru is developing as Delhi, and Raichur is developing as another Bihar. So when you say South, South is not uniform in that sense. This is a consequence of the mode of development we are pursuing. Unless we attend to that, these superficial solutions will not go to the roots.”
Dhanya points out the lack of transparency from the Union government, saying, “The BJP is very calculative. They aren’t revealing how many seats will be added or which states will gain. That itself shows there’s a political strategy behind it.”
Pooja adds, “This isn’t about north vs south, but about fairness. Why should states that effectively controlled their populations be punished while those that didn’t are rewarded?”
As the conversation turns to Karnataka’s recent declaration that it is Naxal-free, the panel examines whether the movement is truly gone or if it has only changed form.
On the state’s anti-Naxal operations, Shivasundar challenges the official narrative, saying, “The idea that Naxalism has been ‘eliminated’ is misleading. The state has used repression, but it has not addressed the conditions that gave rise to the movement.”
All this and more—tune in.
TNM turns 11!
We’re celebrating with a Buy 1, Gift 1 Subscription offer! Subscribe and gift independent journalism to a friend or a family member. Subscribe here: https://pages.razorpay.com/tnm-11th
Listen & follow on Apple
Listen & follow on Spotify
Once a month, we will invite one TNM subscriber to the show. Write to us on what you would like to speak about to southcentral@thenewsminute.com
Send your thoughts, suggestions and criticism as well.
Audio Timecodes
00:00:00 – Introduction
00:02:05 – Subscribe & Support TNM
00:03:00 – Headlines
00:08:54 – Delimitation
00:39:57 - Karnataka’s Naxal Journey
01:07:44 - Letters
01:11:30 – Recommendations
References
India’s Emerging Crisis of Representation
The long march to surrender: How Karnataka became ‘Naxal-free’
Recommendations
Shivasundar
In the wake of Naxalbari sumant
Nightmarch: Among India's Revolutionary Guerrillas
I Am on the Hit List: Murder and Myth-making in South India
Iconoclast: A Reflective Biography of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar
PV Ramesh
Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI
Genesis: Artificial Intelligence
Malayali Memorial: And Other Stories
Leena Reghunath
Pooja Prasanna
Jane Fonda: Life Achievement Award Acceptance Speech
Dhanya Rajendran