A day after cab aggregator 'Ola' filed an affidavit in the Karnataka high court, claiming that it respected the new regulations and accusing its rival Uber of being 'foreign', the latter has hit back.
The Economic Times reported:
In a lengthy affidavit to the High Court, Ola said it is the only cab aggregator to have been issued a license under the new regulations because it has satisfied all conditions. It called Uber's petition challenging the regulations as "motivated and has been filed in an attempt to bypass the laws of the land by foreign companies who run their operations in this country for profit without due regard for the applicable laws."
Responding to the allegations, Bhavik Rathod,General Manager at Uber Bangalore, has written a lengthy blog. Here's the unedited version of the full text:
LETâ€™S KEEP BANGALORE MOVING
When I launched Uber in Bangalore in August 2013, our first city in India, all I was focussed on was to transform the way we move in our city using technology. It all started with a hyperlocal team of three who were really passionate about the city - just like in any of the other 400+ cities Uber is present in globally. At Uber, we celebrate cities - weâ€™re a global company with local roots where we keep our customers first - riders and drivers.
There has been a lot of talk about the Karnataka On demand Transportation Technology Aggregator Rules, 2016 that were recently released. As I read through them, I couldnâ€™t help but think about the reasons why we picked Bangalore as the first city to launch in India. The startup capital of India has a reputation of embracing disruptive technology. Regulations for our sector reflect how governments are embracing the value that Uber brings. At the same time, these regulations need to enable, not thwart a nascent industry that is shaping future mobility in cities across the world.
Itâ€™s equally important that we work together with the government to help meet legitimate regulatory requirements that will support the future of mobility. However, itâ€™s unfortunate to see the turn that this industry has taken today. Instead of rising above differences and helping build the future of this sector, itâ€™s disappointing to note how baseless allegations are being levelled to confound and complicate matters.
In the affidavit submitted by our competition, they have not commented on the regulations and are silent on the subject matter of the petition. However, they have chosen the Honâ€™ble Court as an avenue to level false allegations while not taking a stand on whether it supports or objects to these regulations.
Uber has the deepest respect for the laws of India. What makes Uber â€˜foreignâ€™? The fact that we are established in San Francisco but have a hyperlocal team solving problems that are locally relevant. Or that, just like our competitors, we received most of our funding from â€˜foreignâ€™ investors.
As required, Uber has submitted details for 100 cars to obtain the license under the current regulations. But for reasons unknown to us, weâ€™re yet to be granted the license and have instead been asked to undergo the same process all over again with another local authority. Despite this, we are acutely aware that such a license which only provides a license for 100 cars and leaves out the vast majority of other cars (estimated at close to 100,000), is not the level playing field that government seeks to create. This is also precisely why Uber has moved court.
Products like Autos, Shuttles and Bikes may be unregulated and termed illegal right now but hold promise in serving the cityâ€™s transport needs. The need of the hour is for government to acknowledge the value that disruptive businesses bring and formulate regulations that maximise consumer benefit while helping our cities.
We are a law abiding, for-profit company and that is why it matters that the new laws being framed for a new sector like ours take into account the innovation and change that technology has brought to the industry. It matters to us that the laws that are getting framed give riders the choice and drivers the opportunities that make them better off. It also matters to us that regulations apply equally to all.
Itâ€™s not about â€˜bypassing laws of the landâ€™ but itâ€™s about building for tomorrow by participating today - so we donâ€™t stifle the innovations that is surely coming to us tomorrow. At Uber, we believe in celebrating cities - each of the city that we build ground up, every decision taken with the best interest of our riders, drivers and cities in mind. In this safety is paramount and our technology makes it possible to focus on safety for riders and drivers before, during, and after every trip in ways that were not possible before smartphones.
We have full faith in the Honâ€™ble High Court and also in the senior leadership within the government of Karnataka. We are very hopeful of a positive outcome to this and look forward to progressive regulations to govern the entire aggregator industry.