The High Court set aside an official ban for women in a job notification by Kerala Metals and Minerals Limited (KMML).

Kerala High Court wikimedia commons pictureRojy Pala, Malayalam Wikipedia
news Law Saturday, April 17, 2021 - 09:08

The Kerala High Court on Friday observed that a qualified woman cannot be denied employment based on her gender and that the job requires working in the night. Justice Anu Sivaraman said that protective provisions cannot stand in the way of an eligible woman. The HC set aside an official ban for women in a job notification by Kerala Metals and Minerals Limited (KMML). The court observed that the embargo violated the articles laid down in the Indian Constitution.

"It is the bounden duty of the respondents who are government and government functionaries to take all appropriate steps to see that a woman is able to carry out the duties assigned to her at all hours, safely and conveniently. If that be so, there would be no reason for denying appointment to a qualified hand only on the grounds that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours," the judgement stated.

The court gave the verdict on April 9 on a plea by a 25-year-old woman engineering graduate, challenging the ‘male only’ provisions in a notification inviting applications for the permanent post of Safety Officer available in KMML.

The petitioner, Treasa Josfine, sought to set aside Section 66(1)(b) of the Factories Act, 1948, contending that it denies her right to participate in the selection for appointment as Safety Officer. The petitioner also contended that the provision is violative of the valuable rights guaranteed to her under the Constitution.

The court observed that the Factories Act, 1948, was enacted at a time when requiring a woman to work in an establishment of any nature, more so in a factory at night, could only be seen as exploitative and violative of her rights.

"Apparently, the world has moved forward and women who were relegated to the roles of homemakers during the times when the enactment had been framed, have taken up much more demanding roles in society as well as in economic spheres. In the present scenario, to say that a graduate engineer in safety engineering cannot be considered for appointment as Safety Officer in a public sector undertaking because of an offending provision under Section 66(1)(b) of the Factories Act, according to me, is completely untenable and unacceptable,” the court said.

“This is evident from the fact that the state of Kerala has approved an amendment to the Rules which permits the engagement of women on condition that all safety precautions and facilities for such engagement are arranged by the employer,” the court added.

The court noted the decision in Hindustan Latex Ltd's case and the subsequent laying down of the law by the Supreme Court, which made it abundantly clear that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied her right to be considered for employment only on the basis of her gender.

It opined that the embargo contained in the notification that 'only male candidates can apply' is violative of the provisions of Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution. "The said provision in the notification is, therefore, set aside," the court said. The court also directed that appropriate action be taken without further delay.

PTI Inputs

Become a TNM Member for just Rs 999!
You can also support us with a one-time payment.