Tamil Nadu

Temporary relief for Pa Ranjith in Raja Raja Cholan row

Written by : Bharathy Singaravel

Director Pa Ranjith has got temporary relief in connection to the 2019 Raja Raja Cholan case against him. On August 03, 2021, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court passed an interim injunction on the filing of the final report against the director.

In June 2019, the director had been speaking at a commemorative event for the late Umar Farooq, organized by the Neela Puligal Iyakkam that he’d founded. The event took place in Thiruppanandal near Kumbakonam. At the event, Ranjith had criticized a tendency of various caste groups to take uncritical pride in Raja Raja Cholan, and added that for Dalits the rule of the erstwhile king had been a dark age. Land had been forcibly taken away from them and many forms of caste oppression had begun during Raja Raja Cholan’s reign, he said.

On June 11, 2019, based on a complaint by former Thanjavur District Secretary Ka Bala of the Hindu Makkal Katchi, Thiruppandandal police registered an FIR against Ranjith under IPC 153 (wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot) and 153 (A) (1) (a) (promoting enmity between different groups). Ranjith had filed an anticapotry bail plea the following day.

The same month the Madurai Bench granted him conditional anticipatory, but had warned against making controversial comments in the future.

Ranjith’s petition to the Madurai Bench to dismiss the case against him came up for hearing today. In summary, he had said in the petition that on June 05, 2019 he had given a speech at a Neela Puligal Iyakkam event, during when he’d spoken about some truths regarding Raja Raja Cholan. In the petition, he also says that he’d spoken about what Umar Farooq had written in his book about landless people, particularly landless people in the Delta region. He states that many history books and other people have spoken about the same issue, but only his words were being misrepresented. Since he had said nothing new in that event and because his words do not target any particular community, he’d requested that the case be dismissed.

The Madurai Bench has for the time being granted an interim injunction and  adjourned the hearing until August 31. The court has asked the government to respond in the meantime. Justice Illangovan who presided over the case said before passing the order that “a person has the right to express their opinion.”

Who spread unblurred videos of women? SIT probe on Prajwal Revanna must find

Telangana police closes Rohith Vemula file, absolves former V-C and BJP leaders

BJP could be spending more crores than it declared, says report

Despite a ban, why are individuals still cleaning septic tanks in Karnataka

Building homes through communities of care: A case study on trans accommodation from HCU