|The News Minute | March 11, 2015 | 7:10 p.m. IST |
Former Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, has been summoned to a special court on April 8 as ordered in a directive issued by it on Wednesday.
Four others, including the former head of the Ministry of Coal, P.C. Parakh, Kumaramangalam Birla of the Aditya Birla Group, and two officials of Hindalco have also been summoned for the case pertaining to the allotment of coal block Talabira II in Odisha.
The allotment issue, which forms part of the discrepancies referred to as â€śCoal Gateâ€ť, was one of the several scams that damaged the UPA governmentâ€™s reputation.
Singh, who was the coal minister during 2005 when the allotment was done, is now being questioned by the Special court after being charged with criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust and under various sections of the prevention of corruption act.
The charges severely tainted Singhâ€™s name during his second tenure as PM and head of the UPA II regime.
In a statement issued on the PIB website in October 2013, Singh had attempted to put forth his version of the story.
Singh, while mapping out the entire chain of events began by stating that he was aware of the case being subject to a CBI inquiry which was being monitored by the Supreme Court but the case was one where â€śthe final decision differed from the earlier recommendation of the Screening Committeeâ€ť. He further goes on to add that â€śthis was done following a representation received in the Prime Minister`s Office from one of the parties, which was referred to the Ministry of Coalâ€ť, and that he was satisfied with the decision taken in this regard.
According to Singh, K. M. Birla had written to him on May 7, 2005 â€śrequesting allocation of Talabira-II coal block in Odisha to HINDALCOâ€ť, a request he says he acknowledged with a response -â€śPlease get a report from Coal Ministryâ€ť.
The former PM also states that he forwarded the request to the Coal Ministry on May 25, 2005 to look into the matter and come up with a report. On June 17, 2005 he says that Birla resent the request which was again linked to the earlier mail to the Coal Ministry.
He mentions too that in August 2005, the Coal Ministry sent back a report which mentioned that â€śthe Screening Committee had considered three major contenders for allocation of Talabira-II and decided to allocate this block to Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC)â€ť.
The Screening Committee's reasons for initial proposal for allocation:
The Committee, according to Singh, gave three reasons for its choice. The first alleged that coal linkages had been provided by Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (MLC, sister concern of NLC and a PSU) to Hindalco, â€śa long time backâ€ť and that â€śHINDALCO had not used the coalâ€ť. The remaining reasons that influenced their choice were that â€śTalabira-II & III blocks needed to be developed togetherâ€ť so as to not waste coal at their common boundary and that the sister PSUs could do it as a â€śjoint ventureâ€ť.
Singh's reference to Birla and the Odisha government request:
Singh then refers to Birlaâ€™s request and the reasons the industrialist stated as to why the block should be allotted to Hindalco. According to Singh, Birla pressed his case by saying that Hindalco had applied for the block as far back as 1996 and that the coal linkage issue as mentioned by the committee was not valid as the lease for the plant that the mine was to service hadnâ€™t materialized. Birla also mentions, as Singh states, that the current coal shortage couldnâ€™t be tided over by MCL and that the Odisha government favored Hindalco.
Singh then claims that while the file was â€śbeing processed in PMOâ€ť, he received a letter from the Odisha CM, Naveen Patnaik, backing Hindalcoâ€™s cause with reasons like â€ś(it will) generate more employmentâ€ť, and that it would â€ścreate more wealth for the country and add to the growth of the manufacturing sector directlyâ€ť. Singh further adds that the letter asked for these â€śspecial considerationsâ€ť to be kept in mind and the â€śmatter examined expeditiouslyâ€ť.
Singh then states that he had returned the file to the Coal Ministry with the recommendation that the CMâ€™s request be considered and the matter re-evaluated.
The Screening Committee's final proposal and the reasons stated for the allocation:
On September 16, 2005, as per Singh, the Ministry of Coal resubmitted a proposal that recommended a joint venture among MCL, NCL and Hindalco with a sharing ratio of 70:15:15. The proposal also further stated that â€śThe satisfaction level of NLC would be 29% of its total requirement and of HINDALCO, 81.5%â€ť.
The reasons given by the Ministry for coming up with this system of sharing that seemed to undermine NCLâ€™s interests were that Hindalco had been preferred by the State government. It also backed its reasoning by saying that- â€śHowever, as NLC and Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. are proposing to set up a JV power plant from the coal available from Talabira-II & III, NLCâ€™s full requirements could be met from Mahanadi Coalfields Ltdâ€™s reserves in Talabira-III. This would fully meet the coal requirement of the two CPSUs to set up their power project and protect the interests of the CPSUsâ€ť.
Singh's defense of the allocation:
Singh, in his statement then goes on to mention the reasons for the allotment, reasserting the Odisha governmentâ€™s inclination to reward Hindalco while also supporting his argument by saying that â€śUnder the MMDR Act, the mining lease for coal is granted by the State Government with the previous approval of the Central Governmentâ€ť. The former PM thus adds that â€śunder the federal framework of sharing mining rights as provided under the Act, both the Central and State Governments need to concur before an allocatee can be granted a mining leaseâ€ť.
Finally, while addressing the equity sharing ratio, Singh does admit that â€śthis would require relaxation of guidelines that were approved by PM earlierâ€ť, yet he also says that it could be considered as an option as â€śNLC and Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. are sister PSUs and NLCâ€™s requirements of coal could be met from Mahanadi Coalfields Ltdâ€™s 70% share of productionâ€ť.
On October 10, 2005, he says his office finally approved the proposal.
Here is the full text of the Singhâ€™s statement:
Talabira Coal Block Allocation Matter
1. There has been extensive media coverage recently of the matter relating to the allocation of Talabira-II and III coal blocks in Odisha to Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd, Neyveli Lignite Corporation and HINDALCO.
2. Coal block allocations, including this one, are the subject of a CBI inquiry which is being monitored by the Supreme Court. However, the Talabira coal block allocation is a case where the final decision differed from the earlier recommendation of the Screening Committee, and this was done following a representation received in the Prime Minister`s Office from one of the parties, which was referred to the Ministry of Coal.
3. The Prime Minister is satisfied that the final decision taken in this regard was entirely appropriate and is based on the merits of the case placed before him.
4. The details of the processing at different stages of the decision making are summarized in the Annexure to clarify the position.
5. It is recognized that this allocation is subject to an ongoing investigation. No impediment is being placed on the CBI to continue the investigation and seek fresh information which may have a bearing on the case.
6. The investigation on this and other matters must take their normal course under the law.
1. The Prime Minister received a letter dated 7.5.2005 from Shri Kumar Mangalam Birla requesting allocation of Talabira-II coal block in Odisha to HINDALCO for its 650 MW captive power plant in its Integrated Aluminium Project in SambalpurDistrict, Odisha and for a 100 MW captive plant for the expansion of its Hirakud Aluminium plant in Odisha. The letter was acknowledged by the Prime Minister who noted on the letterâ€“ â€śPlease get a report from Coal Ministryâ€ť.
2. The Prime Ministerâ€™s Office forwarded the letter to the Ministry of Coal on 25.5.2005 requesting it to look into the matter and send a report.
3. Shri Kumar Mangalam Birla submitted another letter to the Prime Minister on 17.6.2005 repeating the request. This letter was linked to the earlier reference and sent to the Ministry of Coal with a request to send their report on the matter.
4. In August 2005, Ministry of Coal sent its file on the matter to the Prime Minister. In the file, it was mentioned that the Screening Committee had considered three major contenders for allocation of Talabira-II and decided to allocate this block to Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) as:
(i) adequate coal linkages had been provided to HINDALCO from Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (MCL) a long time back and HINDALCO had not used the coal,
(ii) Talabira-II & III blocks needed to be developed together to extract an additional 30 million tonnes of coal which would have gone waste otherwise at the boundaries of each block, (Talabira-III is a coal block which had been separately allocated to Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.) and
(iii) NLC & Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. can develop the two blocks together as one large mine through a Joint Venture (JV).
Shri Kumar Mangalam Birla had requested for allocation of Talabira-II to HINDALCO as:
(i) HINDALCO was the first applicant for it as long back as 1996,
(ii) the coal linkage granted earlier was not used as a bauxite mine lease relating to the aluminium plant had not materialized,
(iii) in view of the current shortage of coal, Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. will not be able to supply coal as per the earlier linkage, and
(iv) the Government of Odisha favoured allocation of Talabira-II to HINDALCO in preference to NLC.
5. While the file was being processed in PMO, the Prime Minister received a letter dated 17.8.2005 from the Chief Minister of Odisha on the allotment of Talabira-II to HINDALCO. The CMâ€™s letter mentioned that the State Government had assigned topmost priority to the allocation of Talabira-II to HINDALCO and had strongly supported the case in the Steering Committee meeting. The letter mentioned that aluminium plants should get higher priority over independent power plants as they generate more employment, create more wealth for the country and add to the growth of the manufacturing sector directly. Further, it stated that it is equitable to accord higher priority to units adding more value through manufacturing within the state where the coal mine is located. The letter urged that these special considerations be kept in mind and the matter examined expeditiously.
6. On 29.8.2005, the Ministry of Coal file on the matter was returned with the comment that while the file was being processed, a letter was received from Chief Minister, Odisha and the Ministry of Coal may please take this letter of CM,Odisha on record, re-examine the matter in light thereof and resubmit the file.
7. Ministry of Coal resubmitted the file on 16.9.2005 with the proposal that
i) Talabira II & III be mined as a single mine with the mining done by a JV formed between MCL, NLC & HINDALCO.
ii) The shareholding of the JV between MCL:NLC:HINDALCO to be 70:15:15.
iii) Mahanadi Coalfields Ltdâ€™s equity shareholding of 70% would approximately equal Talabira-IIIâ€™s extractable reserves as a proportion of the total of the two blocks. Under the sharing arrangement, 70% of the total annual production will be handed over to Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.
iv) The remaining 30% of the annual production will be shared equally between HINDALCO and NLC with each getting 15%.
v) The satisfaction level of NLC would be 29% of its total requirement and of HINDALCO, 81.5%.
8. The reasoning given by the Ministry of Coal was that:
i) Talabira-II & III combined have reserves of 553 million tonnes.
ii) The total requirement of coal from these blocks from the three main contenders is 503 million tonnes, with NLC seeking 280 million tonnes, HINDALCO seeking 100 million tonnes and Orissa Sponge Iron Ltd (OSIL) seeking 123 million tonnes.
iii) Allocating the blocks to these three would leave little coal for Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.
iv) NLC may not be dropped as it is a Central PSU already recommended by the Screening Committee. HINDALCOâ€™s case for allocation has been strongly recommended by the State Government and it has also been an early applicant. OSIL can be accommodated elsewhere.
v) It was further brought out that the Government of Odisha have indicated a clear preference for allotment of the block to HINDALCO in the interest of creating more employment and growth of the manufacturing sector in the state.
vi) It was also pointed out that while both HINDALCO and NLC get the same amount of coal, HINDALCOâ€™s satisfaction level is about 80%, whereas NLCâ€™s is much lower.. However, as NLC and Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. are proposing to set up a JV power plant from the coal available from Talabira-II & III, NLCâ€™s full requirements could be met from Mahanadi Coalfields Ltdâ€™s reserves in Talabira-III. This would fully meet the coal requirement of the two CPSUs to set up their power project and protect the interests of the CPSUs.
9. While processing this proposal in PMO, it was noted that the ownership ratio in the JV ownership was not in congruence with the guidelines approved by PM on 09.06.2005 which required this ratio to be in proportion to the assessed requirement of coal of each allocatee. As per this guideline, the NLC:HINDALCO ratio in their 30% share should be 22.5:7.5 and not 15:15 as was proposed.
10. While recommending the case to the Prime Minister, it was clearly brought out that:
i) The State Government of Odisha has strongly recommended allocation of Talabira-II to HINDALCO and supported it in the Screening Committee. Chief Minister, Odisha had reiterated this position assigning topmost priority to the allocation ofTalabira-II in favour of HINDALCO.
ii) Under the MMDR Act, the mining lease for coal is granted by the State Government with the previous approval of the Central Government. Thus, under the federal framework of sharing mining rights as provided under the Act, both the Central and State Governments need to concur before an allocatee can be granted a mining lease. Accordingly, the strong recommendation of the Government of Odisha is important and has to be given due consideration while taking a decision in the matter.
iii) The Ministryâ€™s suggestion for allocation of 30% share of production in the JV for Talabira-II & III combined to NLC & HINDALCO, with the remaining 70% of the total production taken by MCL has merit and may therefore be considered for acceptance.
iv) As for the NLC:HINDALCO equity ratio in the JV, this would require relaxation of guidelines that were approved by PM earlier, but this could be considered as NLC and Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. are sister PSUs and NLCâ€™s requirements of coal could be met from Mahanadi Coalfields Ltdâ€™s 70% share of production. This would fully meet the coal requirement of the two CPSUs to set up their power project and protect the interests of the CPSUs.
11. Based on these arguments, and also on the reasoning of the Ministry, it was proposed that Prime Minister may approve:
i) Allocation of Talabira-II & III to a JV owned jointly by MCL:NLC:HINDALCO in the ratio 70:15:15 with the other aspects as proposed by the Ministry.
ii) The existing long term coal linkage of HINDALCO may be reviewed and suitably reduced after taking into account HINDALCOâ€™s requirement of coal for the project and the share of HINDALCO in the coal mined by the JV in Talabira-II & III.
12. The Prime Minister approved the proposal on 1.10.2005.