To say that the aftermath of the Uri attack has created friction between India and Pakistan would be an understatement. What followed was a diplomatic battle at the United Nations, a surgical strike conducted by India, a ban placed on Pakistani artistes in Bollywood and plenty of war-mongering on social media.
But amidst the calls for blood, there were a few voices still asking for peace and condemning the celebration of death and destruction. One such voice belongs to Alizay Jaffer, a woman from Pakistan who wrote a Facebook post on September 29 about the rising tension between the neighbours.
She writes about how people across the border in both countries have a "strange affinity" with each other, much like fighting siblings who often exchange roles and enjoy cultural similarities despite themselves.
Here is the text of her post, reproduced in full.
Itâ€™s strange, this affinity with India. I find myself getting increasingly upset at the abuse and hatred tossed from one border to another, with little rationale apart from the 69 year old chips on our shoulders. These chips have, over time, turned into boulders, and who doesnâ€™t crumble under the weight of those?
Itâ€™s very strange, this affinity with India. When Amitabh Bachchan is in the hospital, we pray for his good health; when Ranbir Kapoorâ€™s film is a hit, weâ€™re prouder than Neetu and Rishi; we never deny that no one brings romance to life like the voices of Kishore and Rafi; they are in unanimous agreement that their local music scene is not a patch on ours; if we happen to interact abroad, theyâ€™re the only pardesis we include in the â€˜desiâ€™ category; their monuments carry our history; our language carries their roots.
Itâ€™s far too strange, this affinity with India. Like siblings, we retaliate to each otherâ€™s provocations. Ultimately, we both share the label of being impulsive and emotional in our responses to one another â€“ â€˜Look at what youâ€™re doing in Kashmirâ€™ â€˜Hah, look at what youâ€™re doing in Balochistanâ€™; â€˜You attacked us first in Uriâ€™ â€˜Have you forgotten about Kargilâ€™?; â€˜You started it!â€™ â€˜No! You started it!â€™
Like orphaned trust fund babies, we feel entitled yet have no idea how to cope. They neither acknowledge nor respond to Muslims being massacred for eating beef in Gujrat, for instance, and we? We turn a blind eye to Christians and Hindus being physically assaulted for eating before Iftar in Ramzan. Theyâ€™re destroying Kashmir, we say, Kashmiris have a right to be independent (or choose us, of course), but we forget how we throttled Bangladesh â€“ why should a Bengali speaking majority not accept Urdu as its national language? We never speak about that, do we? Too soon, perhaps.
When I think about some of my best days and nights in the last ten years, more than 50% of them were spent with my brothers and sisters from across the border; sharing a meal, listening to music, discussing politics, or anything but; laughing, dancing, singing; but most importantly, completely aware yet in vehement passive rebellion against the lines that keep us apart.
Come to think of it now, it isnâ€™t strange at all, this affinity with India. Our proverbial Lord and Master, the gargantuan power that rules us, â€˜The Westâ€™, is an absentee parent; one weâ€™re constantly trying to please but one who never really loved us anyway. If there is anyone for us, itâ€™s each other. Whatâ€™s strange is our reluctance to acknowledge this.
Whatâ€™s strange is the burden we carry of decisions made in our pasts, based on an entirely different socio-political context, when a common, exploitative antagonist made sure we saw each other as the aggressor, and boy, did we fall for it. Whatâ€™s strange is our prolonged blindness to the immense opportunities that lie before us as a unit, and the vast desolation that lies before us as enemies.
The strangest thing about our relationship, in fact, is our propensity to change roles. To the world, most of the time, we are siblings; constantly at loggerheads, trying to get into daddyâ€™s good books so that he may buy us a toy, or take us for a drive, or better yet, increase our allowance. Other times, we are like a divorced couple, sharing space, constantly bickering over who lost out in the settlement, unable to finally come to terms with the fact that we are no longer together. It seems the scars of our separation are still so ripe, so painful, that they canâ€™t accept that we left, and we canâ€™t accept that they let us leave. In an event like this, we only find solace in making sure the other is just as hurt as we are, so we put in our all our resources, our best efforts, to do exactly that.
I read today that India claimed they carried out a surgical attack in Uri. Ridiculous. I immediately read several, equally ridiculous Pakistani reactions; some hitting below the belt, others claiming that one shouldnâ€™t expect more from mass murdering politicians, like the ones we have across the border. Somehow, suddenly, we are all too forgiving of our own â€˜gloriousâ€™ politicians. Itâ€™s strange how quick we are to forget how much trouble governance is in, on both sides, when we jump up to point fingers.
Iâ€™m sure this news will leave me in a monthâ€™s time. What hasnâ€™t left me is the news about a Pakistani Head of Stateâ€™s arrival in Delhi for a test match, ultimately averting the threat of war; or an Indian politician putting his hand forward to greet his Pakistani counterpart, to curb tensions; or that time when Ganguly acknowledged that thereâ€™s no one greater than Wasim; or when Shoaib Malik married Sania Mirza; or that image of the guards in the most beautiful fraternal embrace I have ever seen, on Holi at Wagah Border. I suppose itâ€™s because some of us look for peace, we hanker for it, while others, they look for war.
I suppose what Iâ€™m trying to say is, in 20 yearsâ€™ time, Uri will be just another event in the text books. It will be labeled as yet another period in our collective histories when our â€˜cold warâ€™ with India almost turned into â€˜hot warâ€™. It will be just another opportunity for me to pick on my Indian friends or vice versa. It will be just another event our older uncles will discuss when they try to feel better about Pakistanâ€™s failures and convince themselves that partition was the best thing that couldâ€™ve happened for us and that, without India, â€˜weâ€™re better offâ€™.
What will never be â€˜just another eventâ€™ is one we never address. The fact that we are now divorced; the fact that our separation is painful for both of us; the fact that where there is now hate, there was once unity and a common pride; the fact that we allowed an external power to come in and manipulate us, and we fell prey; the fact that no one will know us like we know each other, because after all, we were once but one.
It is comforting somehow, that when I messaged one of my closest friends across the border, expressing concern over the destructive megalomaniac tendencies of our governments, he responded and said, â€˜It doesnâ€™t matter what they do, you know I will always love youâ€™. It is comforting somehow, that in 20 yearsâ€™ time, if you look away from the textbooks, and turn to your ancient scriptures or your holy books, it wonâ€™t take you long to see that since time immemorial, there is only one message they are trying to convey, only one message we should be paying attention to; and that message is Love.
Alizay's post went viral on social media and has been shared more than 2,700 times. Unsurprisingly, there were hate comments on the post but there were many who expressed solidarity with Alizay's sentiments as well.
Earlier on Monday, Alizay posted another status on Facebook, responding to the overwhelming reception that the previous one had received.
She countered the people who had told her that she did not know what it was like to lose someone in a war. "Their solution to that is, (wait for it), more war. How does that make any sense?" she wrote.
Alizay also said that she had been approached by a few TV channels but had refused to express her opinions on air because she lacked expertise. She reiterated her appeal for peace and pointed out that this does not translate to being unpatriotic:
"There are people on either side who want war. That is their opinion; that is their notion of patriotism; that is their nationalism. BUT there are people on either side who want peace; those who feel that patriotism does not mean war, but instead that no more people should die. That is the side of history I'd like to be on. Love."